I couldn't agree more. That's why I posted it. The feminazis don't really want equality. They feel they were 2nd best for a long time and now they want to turn the tables and do the roles that they feel were the 'good' roles, the ones formerly belonging to men and delegate to men the 'demeaning' roles they felt they were forced to take, such as childrearing. Some of them actually say childrearing with a sneer. I had one professor in college who could make 'childrearing' sound like 'pedophile'.
I think the ultimate goal of all this stuff is to make a kind of unisex.
Yes, and no. I think if they could make men obsolete, they would. But then who would do the jobs they find demeaning?
That's why they're always pushing homosexuality/bisexuality too.
Plus gay married men with kids show just how unnecessary it is for us to continue to 'force' women into that role. Funny how it's demeaning for women but somehow fulfulling for a gay couple.
"I think if they could make men obsolete, they would. But then who would do the jobs they find demeaning?"
I think you see the feminist side of this, but there is also a male side to this, generally made up of gays and what I call sub-men (questionably straight men who serve the gay agenda and shirk male responsibilities)... others call them "metrosexuals". See there is a male-side to this ultra-leftist plot as well as female.