Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest
Giving broad international status to a communist government like Brasil's is "practical"? How?

Brasil is a democracy and the fact that at this term they have elected left wing government does not mean much. Would you propose to remove USA from the UN Security Council when liberal Democracts get into power?

The main reason why Brasil would be a proper choice is that it is the largest Latin American country and it would be fair if their continent were represented.

Nigeria could qualify for similiar reason. So I would add India - the second most populous country in the world and the largest, most free democracy (although not rich), Brasil and Nigeria as permanent memebers without veto power.

15 posted on 06/16/2005 10:49:05 AM PDT by A. Pole (Gov.Gumpas:"But that would be putting the clock back, have you no idea of progress, of development?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: A. Pole
Brasil is a democracy and the fact that at this term they have elected left wing government does not mean much.

It means plenty.

Would you propose to remove USA from the UN Security Council when liberal Democracts get into power?

As bad as the Democrats are, they can't hold a candle to someone as radically leftist as Lula.

The main reason why Brasil would be a proper choice is that it is the largest Latin American country and it would be fair if their continent were represented.

That doesn't explain how it's practical, which is what you earlier said it was. And I don't have much qualms about "fairness" when it comes to giving status to Castro-aligned communists.

19 posted on 06/16/2005 11:00:49 AM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson