Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jibaholic
"Maybe they are right not to trust him, but without evidence that amounts to destroying the bonds of marriage."

Of course, Michael lived outside the 'bonds' of his marriage; for all intents and purposes; there were no 'bonds'; there was no covenant to observe.

As for the 'Terri' crowd, wanting the State to be involved; it was from the very beginning - by Federal Court decisions; and 'bad ones' at that.

Appreciate your 'Covenant' with your wife; but .why don't you. . .or why won't you. . .at the least, write in a Will; that you want that 'covenant' to include Living Will decisions' and that they be observed.

If it mean that much to you; then do what it takes to have your covenant legally protected; by every possibility. . .just in the case, something should just not go the way you planned it.

201 posted on 06/16/2005 1:55:36 PM PDT by cricket (Just say NO U.N.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]


To: cricket
Appreciate your 'Covenant' with your wife; but .why don't you. . .or why won't you. . .at the least, write in a Will

After the Terri fiasco my wife and I probably will get living wills. But this is also one more area in which marriage has been eroded. It is not enough that husband and wife trust each other.

203 posted on 06/16/2005 1:58:12 PM PDT by Jibaholic (The facts of life are conservative - Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson