Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bjs1779; kozachka

"No one ever said she had NO cerebral cortex, did they?
Now that you mention it, they did."

Not sure where your link got their Crawford analysis/words but here is his direct court testimony and he goes in to quite a bit of detail to describe what he's seeing. He doesn't say it's completely gone but does indicate there isn't much there. What IS there he gives his opinion.
http://home.comcast.net/~trinity_tx/cranfordfelos.htm

cross, recross and other testimony is here
http://home.comcast.net/~trinity_tx/2002transcripts.htm


177 posted on 06/16/2005 3:38:57 PM PDT by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]


To: Smartaleck
From your first link, I noticed that the court ruled that he was not even qualified to read CT scans which sort of makes his opinion not relevant anyway. Hmmmm...

Considering the amount of talk about her cerebral cortex at the time of Terri's impending death sentence, I would think the M.E. could of been way more specific about the matter. Basically, he just said she had water on the brain ("Hydrocephalus")which is what Doc Hammesfhar said years ago. A not uncommon condition that is very treatable, but her caregivers chose not to intervene.

178 posted on 06/16/2005 4:41:17 PM PDT by bjs1779 ("I don’t want anyone trying to feed that GIRL" Greer thundered from the bench in 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson