Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: april15Bendovr

"I was so distraught, I needed some way to find an artistic response,'' he said.

More blithering "art-speak" - today's modern artists ( I use the term loosely), are encouraged, trained, cajoled and sometimes downright demanded to "express" whatever thought or feelings that float through their transom, and because it's "art", it doesn't matter if it offends people - if anything, they'll say it's offensiveness makes it "better" "art" (and nets the artist press, the Holy Grail of the Moderne Artiste).

These dolts are so arrogant, that they think that they HAVE to express these feelings in ways that others HAVE to be involved, art to them is a narcissitic process: instead of trying to explore his feelings about 9-11 in a more mature, heartfelt manner that's also more PRIVATE, he makes a spectacle of it all, so above all else, no matter what the message is, or why he's doing it...

It's ALL ABOUT HIM.

People like this will never create high art - a true artist would seek to create a work that would transcend his own personal feelings and encompass the event, the people involved, the people who witnessed it, AND his own feelings.

The sculpture of the raising of the flag at Iwo Jima is a perfect example.

This guy is a hack.


20 posted on 06/15/2005 10:11:40 PM PDT by ByDesign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: ByDesign
My sentiments exactly.

Art DEMANDS exceptional SKILL and vision. Renoir, Chagall, Monet, Angelo and da Vinci.

To be inspired is one thing. To truly create a work of art is a whole other matter.
25 posted on 06/15/2005 11:25:45 PM PDT by This Just In ("Those are my principles, if you don't like them, I've got others" - Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson