To: Turbopilot
True, but he couldn't crash the small room into a neighborhood full of homes.
"Rhodes: "Aw (expletive). We're gonna hit houses, dude."
and they did, too .. The plane crashed into a residential neighborhood of Jefferson City, Mo. Through the Grace of God, in this instance, no one on the ground was injured but it doesn't take much to imagine how easily the result could have been devastatingly different.
I understand how tedious flying can be at times, but this sort of 'fooling around' over populated areas is beyond reckless ~ it is downright irresponsible.
22 posted on
06/15/2005 5:09:56 PM PDT by
Zacs Mom
(Proud wife of a Marine! ... and purveyor of "rampant, unedited dialogue")
To: Zacs Mom
I have yet to hear how they "fooled around." I can understand that, to a non-pilot, maybe going to the "maximum" altitude sounds risky, but that maximum is not the physical limit of the aircraft, it's the lower of either the certified limit of the aircraft or the company's limit (which carries the force of law). It's designed to be a safe limit. Exceeding it is physically possible, just not considered safe. And a pilot would have no reason not to go to the maximum safe altitude limit.
28 posted on
06/15/2005 5:14:09 PM PDT by
Turbopilot
(Viva la Reagan Revolucion!)
To: Zacs Mom
>>> I understand how tedious flying can be at times, but this sort of 'fooling around' over populated areas is beyond reckless ~ it is downright irresponsible. <<<
There are no populated areas at 41,000 feet.
68 posted on
06/15/2005 6:55:11 PM PDT by
PhilipFreneau
("The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork." -- Psalms 19:1)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson