Posted on 06/15/2005 4:48:00 PM PDT by Capt. Canuck
Excerpts from conversations between Pinnacle Airlines Capt. Jesse Rhodes and First Officer Peter Cesarz just before they died in the crash of a Bombardier regional jet on Oct. 14, 2004. Investigators say the crash occurred after the pilots took the plane to 41,000 feet, an altitude where engine problems can develop.
9:48:44 p.m.
Cesarz: "Man we can do it. Forty-one it."
9:48:46
Rhodes: "(Unintelligible) baby."
9:48:57
Cesarz: "Hundred and eighty knots, still cruising at Mach point six four."
9:51:51
Cesarz: "There's four-one-oh, my man."
9:51:53
Cesarz: "Made it, man."
9:54:19
Rhodes: "Yeah, that's funny, we got up here, it won't stay up here."
9:54:22
Cesarz: "Dude, it's (expletive) losing it." (Sound of laughing)
10:14:36
Cesarz: "We're not gonna make it, man, we're not gonna make it."
10:14:38
Rhodes: "Is there a road? Tell her we're not gonna make this runway."
10:14:46
Rhodes: "Let's keep the gear up. (Expletive) I don't want to go into houses here."
10:14:51
Cesarz: (Expletive) "road right there."
10:14:52
Rhodes: "Where?"
10:14:52
Cesarz: "Turn, turn..."
10:14:53
Rhodes: "Turn where?"
10:14:53
Cesarz: "Turn to your left, turn to your left."
10:14:56
Rhodes: Either: "I see it" or "I can't."
10:14:58
Warning signal in cockpit: "Too low, terrain, terrain."
10:14:59
Rhodes: "Can't make it."
10:15:03
Rhodes: "Aw (expletive). We're gonna hit houses, dude."
Source: National Transportation Safety Board
"... identify and recovery from whatever flavor of spin you happen to find yourself..."
Nose down, prayers up works for me.
Thanks, Dad, but you're the one who's still missing the point.
The point is that they weren't locked in by the TSA or anyone else. Being locked in is being held prisoner.
They were working in a locked room. It's no different than the guys working in the memory & cpu cages at the local Fry's.
If they or anyone else doesn't like working in a locked room, they can quit their jobs and go fly (or Fry's) somewhere else. The distinction is a subtle one, but it does exist. So, let's lay off this 'locked in' hyperbole.
As for the rest of your pontification about their capabilities or motives, I prefer to withhold judgement over their actions until the investigation is complete.
No kidding... I thought it was real and didn't check, primarily b/c it pre-dates the Internet. When my kids grow up, I will regale them with stories of the "old days" when we had to rely on word of mouth for our urban legends... none of this sissy Internet stuff, you kids today have it so easy.
"No more than we'd nominate you for one if your brakes failed after you "recklessly" took your car all the way to the speed limit."
Sorry, but I'm having a little trouble buying your spin here.
From the transcript:
This is for all of you who choose to make fun of the DEATH of 2 human beings. I'm sure Alison appreciates your sentiments on her husbands death just shy of the birth of their child. I'm sure peters family appreciates it as well. You can talk about who did what and what caused what but it comes back to the fact that 2 PEOPLE are dead. Two families are devastated. People make mistakes, huge ones even. We are human. Jessie and Peter did his best to make sure no one else on the ground was hurt and they accomplished that. I know plenty of pilots and many of them joke, push limits, die. It is not fun it is not funny. Jessie was a wonderful human being, a loving husband, father, son and friend. To those of you who like to talk your little insults, grow up. You should have a little respect when there is a horrible, devastating death. Would you want your life to be considered a joke? Beavis & Butthead, Darwin Awards, get a freakin life. To Jessie, his family, his friends, you were, are and always will be loved. To the rest of you who make a mockery or enjoy your idiotic comments, you won't live forever. Do you want your family and friends to read horrid things about you? Any of you? Fight all you want about the logistics of the crash, it was a crash. It was avoidable, it was a mistake, but many of you like to have "fun" when you repo, I know, I here it all the time. So lay your blame, crack your jokes, keep thinking you are so funny and smart and while you are at it, go to hell.
Jessie and Peter may you rest in Peace.
Alison, Cassidy, Emma and Aiden, God watch you, keep you and Bless you.
Uh, well, I hold a Commercial SEL and CFII. Which makes me squat on this forum. However, I do know there is no violation of FARs, or deviation from anything in AIM (I guess that is what your are calling basic airmanship???).
Sorry, but from what we know, the service ceiling was FL41. They were legal, and the airframe probably shouldn't be. The fact that neither could wax poetic like a Shakespearian sonnet about their pending death is irrelevant armchair airmanship.
The transcipt on the site that you provided the link to doesn't contain any of the stuff in the yahoo article. Which one is correct?
You didn't read the information from the NTSB link I gave to Turbopilot. After you've read the report, drop me another note if you still think no FARS were violated. Flying at FL410 was only one link in a long chain.
I read the Challenger transcript rather carefully and I don't recall the "Take my Hand" part, I my recollection is clear the only warning before the tape go's dead is Commander Scobee "Oh O" Still very haunting I agree
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.