To: blam
NO NINETY NINE BUCKS TO NAT. GEO.! Not Now - Not Ever.
The present crowd running that operation are a far cry from the Grosvenors. From Global Warming to "The Rain forest Is Dying", the journalists are firmly committed to activist journalism.
NO MONEY FOR SOCIALISTS! !
18 posted on
06/15/2005 11:46:43 AM PDT by
GladesGuru
("In a society predicated upon liberty, it is essential to examine principles)
To: GladesGuru
>>>>The present crowd running that operation are a far cry from the Grosvenors. From Global Warming to "The Rain forest Is Dying", the journalists are firmly committed to activist journalism.
NO MONEY FOR SOCIALISTS! !>>>>
I'm in total agreement with your statement. We dropped our subscription to National Geographic about 25 years ago when we got tired of the lefist propaganda on its pages. What a shame! It used to be a beautiful magazine and then it turned into a depressing and untruthful collection of articles and pix.
41 posted on
06/15/2005 12:01:01 PM PDT by
kitkat
To: GladesGuru
Back in 1965 . . . my boss advised me to check the Boards of Directors . . . re globalists and their reach . . .
The Nat Geo was full of them.
217 posted on
03/06/2010 8:21:32 AM PST by
Quix
( POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson