Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry

There is a difference between evolution and natural selection, natural selection being a blatently NON active process, also given that humans helped in this case even NATURAL selection is a mysnomer. You say plant evolution, I say good farming.


4 posted on 06/15/2005 9:46:46 AM PDT by kharaku (G3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kharaku

Reality doesn't care how you describe it. ;^)


8 posted on 06/15/2005 9:50:12 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: kharaku

> There is a difference between evolution and natural selection

Well, DUH. Evolution is the end result. Natural selection is the mechanism.

> given that humans helped in this case even NATURAL selection is a mysnomer.

What, are humans supernatural? Did they even use direct genetic modification?

No to both. The humans involved here were simply another facet of their environment. The plants evolved accordingly to best propogate their DNA down the line.


10 posted on 06/15/2005 9:51:40 AM PDT by orionblamblam ("You're the poster boy for what ID would turn out if it were taught in our schools." VadeRetro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: kharaku
Evolution is simply change. Whether it happens through natural selection or selective breeding is irrelevant.

Besides, if humans can select for certain traits, why can't environmental pressures? Is there some sort of magic involved, or did you not actually think through your knee-jerk comment?

36 posted on 06/15/2005 10:29:45 AM PDT by Junior (“Even if you are one-in-a-million, there are still 6,000 others just like you.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson