Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ZULU
Cop out.

Please support your accusation or apologize.

65 posted on 06/15/2005 9:55:22 PM PDT by Churchillspirit (Anaheim Angels - 2002 World Series Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Churchillspirit

Wow!

It sounds like you're issuing a challenge to a duel or something.

I'm not the only person who looked at the accident, the reaction of the "Royals", the prior treatment of Diana by the "Royals" and Prince Charles, the implications of a marriage with a Muslim, and actual statments made by her before her untimely death and raised the suspicion she was done in by the Windsors.

My impression of Diana was that she was a relatively innocent, naive decent kid when filthy Prince Charlie got his hands on her, that he was screwing around with Camilla Parker-Bowles, a married woman during their marriage, that he has the personality of a dried out pickle and he strongly resented the very genuine charm, real warmth and personality of a beautiful spouse he was very obviously unworthy of.

Anybody who would find Parker-Bowles perferably to Diana needs a serious mental exam - or at least an eye check-up. I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but Bowles would require the personality of a Cleopatra to compensate for her equine visage.


68 posted on 06/16/2005 11:31:25 AM PDT by ZULU (Fear the government which fears your guns. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson