Janice Rogers Brown Nails the Marxists - (she dared say it! NY Times & liberals aghast!)

NEWSMAX.COM ^ | JUNE 15, 2005 | PHIL BRENNAN

[Stellar Dendrite]

Is she single? I think I'm in love

[jla]

Who would've thought that Reagan's legacy would be continued not at the White House but, (hopefully), on the Supreme Court in the name of Janice Rogers Brown.

[Zack Nguyen]

which gave us Social Security and other programs now central to American life...

It sickens me that the left considers government program "central to American life." We are not their slaves!

[Stellar Dendrite]

Hear, Hear!!! I love savage.

I listen to him a lot, the only time he really disappointed me was recently when he ranted against the Iraq war and said Al-Qaeda and Iraq were not linked. He knows this is not true because he's made the connection before.

[Stellar Dendrite]

I disagree. W is no Ronald Reagan. 50% more funding than clinton on education? The Prescription drug plan?
Sorry, these are socialist decisions that Reagan would never have agreed to.

Look at the congress that Reagan had to work with, and look at what he got done. The democraps had full control over it, yet he got his tax cuts through.

Think about what Ronald Reagan could have done with THIS congress.

Today's Republican party has little room for conservatives. Sure, conservatives are abundant in the base...but the politicians are another story. Unfortunately, today's republican party is the party of Big Government, it is a party that has shifted to the left. If the founding fathers were alive today, the Republican party would be socialist-lite compared to them. That said, I have hope that 2008 will finally bring someone I won't mind pulling the lever for, George Allen from VA.

[daviscupper]

I was just fantasizing. I would love to see her on the Supreme Court. Can you imagine having another Supreme Court Justice who actually would interpret the law and uphold the Constitution, instead of making the law! That would please me very much.

[tenger]

Not interested in "new-tone" talk shows? Who said anything about that? It's called civil discourse as I said. Nothing new about discussing serious issues. Obviously you're a huge Savage fan (complete with the "be here or be nowhere" rant) and we'll leave it at that. I don't care for Hannity much, I'll agree, but I'll listen to Dennis Prager or Michael Medved all day long.

[so_real]

That would please me very much.

Ditto! Big, ditto!

[Lancey Howard]

Phil Brennan is terrific. I just want to laugh myself silly at the scumbags of the socialist left, and especially at their main publication organ, the New York Times.

"Janice Rogers Brown is confirmed for LIFE."

"HA ha....!"

[churchillbuff]

Janice Rogers Brown for supreme court? Hell no!! Janice Rogers Brown for President!""""

No, Janice Rogers Brown for Supreme Court.

[churchillbuff]

I was just fantasizing. I would love to see her on the Supreme Court.""""

BUMP

[churchillbuff]

She is a ray of sweet sunlight for us and a death ray for the Vampire Demon-rats.""""

BUMP

[BlueNgold]

When did government cease to be a necessary evil and become a goody bag to solve our private problems?

Worth repeating, so I did.

[infidel29]

Agreed, I was merely showing my excitement over her marxist bashing. She is truly qualified to be Chief Justice one day, sooner rather than later.

[TheForceOfOne]

Expect political WWIII this fall over the SCOTUS nominee(s). We will see attempted filibusters, the nuclear option, a full MSM blitz against the president and any of his choices,

Democrats in the news making outrageous over the top statements, feet dragging and mountains of document requests by Democrats, organized marches in Washington by both sides, etc. etc. etc.

We will all be exhausted mentally and physically by the time all is said and done. Call it a Royal Rumble, or whatever fits but the Democrats know this could be the end for them with many of the current justices decisions being reversed from Affirmative Action, Roe vs Wade, etc. and I would be very very surprised if they didn't go down swinging.

So hold on to your hat it could get ugly, real ugly with all the special interest groups like ACT, the ACLU, and all the other nut cases who have been given power through the misinterpretation of the Constitution throughout the years. We could see rules reversed that have been in affect since the 1930's. I'm not kidding either.