You don't seem able to comprehend English. Read what I typed, not what you imagine.
Well, here is what you said: "The fact is the Bill of Rights does exactly what you were talking about; it insists upon 'less effective' law enforcement capabilities, precisely to limit the abuse of same."
That's when I asked you, "So are you telling me that any measure that makes law enforcement more effective is, for that very reason, unconstitutional? Or that any such measure is inherently inconsistent with the Bill of Rights? If so, then wow."
In response to what you wrote, I think these are fair questions. Especially the second one. Insulting me won't make the questions go away. Do you really think that more effective law enforcement is inconsistent with the letter or spirit of the Bill of Rights? That's a yes or no question.