Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kesg; Lazamataz

"And I'd gladly PERSONALLY sit in the first building waiting for the attack if you could guarantee me that America would remain (or actually, become) free."

"Uh, why, if you are no longer around to enjoy it? I definitely prefer living in a free country and tracking down terrorists at the same time. But maybe that's just me"

Have you ever heard the saying "give me Liberty or give me death"? I believe Laz is trying to make the point that he would gladly give his life for a free America. He is not alone.


113 posted on 06/14/2005 2:25:35 PM PDT by VRing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: VRing

The PA needs to be destroyed.


117 posted on 06/14/2005 2:31:47 PM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

To: VRing
Have you ever heard the saying "give me Liberty or give me death"? I believe Laz is trying to make the point that he would gladly give his life for a free America. He is not alone.

But he acts like it must be one or the other. That's just plain wrong.

118 posted on 06/14/2005 2:33:37 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

To: VRing
The FISC

The court consists of seven federal judges chosen from the federal district courts by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court; each serves a non-renewable seven-year term. Membership of the court is staggered so that a new member is brought in each year. Members are chosen from different federal districts, however, at least one member must come from a district court in the Washington D.C. area. Judge Royce Lamberth, who is a member of the US District Court for Washington DC, currently serves as the FISC Chief Judge.

Judges are a moot point. Please answer my questions.

119 posted on 06/14/2005 2:38:38 PM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

To: VRing
Constitutional Concerns

The intent behind the passage of the FISA legislation was to impose limits and a review process upon warrantless surveillance and searches conducted for “national security” purposes in light of the numerous abuses by federal agencies against US citizens. But the politicization and present use of the FISA process has resulted in the erosion of numerous Constitutional rights and basic legal procedures that have their roots in free societies dating back to the Magna Carta.

I could go on and on but, it would not convince you. You're a lemming. Good bye.

121 posted on 06/14/2005 2:43:43 PM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson