To: rwfromkansas
Regardless of whether the specific case was proven, I would vote guilty to protect the kids.This kind of attitude usually gets a potential juror struck, early on.
You obviously would rather protect Jackson than the innocent children.
And you would convict a person even if there were reasonable doubt.
149 posted on
06/14/2005 8:50:50 AM PDT by
sinkspur
(If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
To: sinkspur
What is reasonable doubt? What is "enough" evidence?
To: sinkspur
"This kind of attitude usually gets a potential juror struck, early on."
Certainly true, if I admitted that in court. But, I wouldn't.
320 posted on
06/14/2005 10:00:24 AM PDT by
rwfromkansas
(http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson