Posted on 06/14/2005 7:32:32 AM PDT by Asphalt
I watched the jurors being interviewed and it was like taking a train ride into idiot land with no stops. They couldn't even put two sentences together to save their butts. The reasonings for their verdict was pathetic and appalling.
His supporters are ignorant morons. I can't even stand to look at the guy's horrifying face without it sending a cold shiver through my soul. CNN noted he looked "stunned" when the verdict was reached. Gee, I wonder why? Probably because he's guilty as sin.
1 to 1 Jackson puts out an album called "VINDICATION" and a video of him 100 foot tall acting like a Superhero who destroys the "evil" Tom Sneddon while children scream "We love you Michael"!
sounds plausible
My opinion, that most seem to disagree with, is that in this particular case Jacko is innocent. The prosecution had one of the crappiest cases ever. however, I would say that it is more than likely that in the past he has molested boys. It all sounds rather fishy.
Michael Jackson is online this morning sending a 55 gallon drum of Vasoline to Sneddon.
He's knows God is going to get him. BTW That's no umbrella it's a lightning rod.
I wonder if he knows which muscles in his face make a "stunned" look anymore ?
The reasonings for their verdict were perfectly understandable, given the behavior of the mother and the lack of evidence that MJ did anything to her kid.
Jackson molested children, but the prosecution simply didn't prove that he molested this child.
And that's really unfortunate.
I hope they meant that sarcastically or did they also congratulate OJ after he turned his ex-wife into a human facsimile of a Pez dispenser?
"I watched the jurors being interviewed and it was like taking a train ride into idiot land with no stops. They couldn't even put two sentences together to save their butts. The reasonings for their verdict was pathetic and appalling."
jury of his piers
It wasn't about the mother damn. So, you're saying that if a child has a crappy mother, the child should not be believed, therefore, no justice? What kind of bullsh*t is that????
Did you by any chance see the interview with the jury foreman on the Nancy Grace show? She was disgusted, and so was I--and by the time she was done with him, I do believe he looked a little ashamed of himself. (And well he should have.) The question she kept asking was, What on earth did he think a man in his 40s doing in bed with little boys who weren't his own all those night. He wouldn't give a straight answer--but it was obvious he thought the same thing I did--he was molesting the children. YET, he voted "not guilty" on all counts.
Maybe "our" country
is in worse shape than we think.
I mean, if these folks
are "average," how
can a country exist that's
by, for and of them?!
"The reasonings for their verdict were perfectly understandable, given the behavior of the mother and the lack of evidence that MJ did anything to her kid."
I didn't follow it that closely, but that's the information I get. Not that MJ is totally innocent, just that there wasn't enough evidence in this one case.
I'm a rebel, especially when it comes to protecting people from filth like this. I would have voted him guilty not because of the preponderance of evidence, but because of the pattern.
I saw that and I was appalled. Nancy Grace had his butt cornered and he totally couldn't take the heat. If you can't explain your verdict in depth and sound confident about it then something is wrong.
One, I don't think this jury would have convicted him even if they'd had video of him committing the crimes. Two, once a child molester, always a child molester. They can't turn it off. Releasing him is a guarantee that more boys will be molested, and that it will be more difficult to prosecute him in the future. In fact, probably impossible.
Congratulations??????????????????????????
Don't know. Congrats that he escaped, reguardless of whether he was guilty.
If OJ really was framed, then he is the luckiest man in the world, and that was one heck of a frame. If he wasn't, which seemse far more than likely, then I feel very sorry for relatives of the wife.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.