Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congratulations Michael, now please, get help
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | June 14, 2005

Posted on 06/14/2005 7:32:32 AM PDT by Asphalt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 601-609 next last

1 posted on 06/14/2005 7:32:33 AM PDT by Asphalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Asphalt

I watched the jurors being interviewed and it was like taking a train ride into idiot land with no stops. They couldn't even put two sentences together to save their butts. The reasonings for their verdict was pathetic and appalling.


2 posted on 06/14/2005 7:35:59 AM PDT by American Butterfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asphalt

His supporters are ignorant morons. I can't even stand to look at the guy's horrifying face without it sending a cold shiver through my soul. CNN noted he looked "stunned" when the verdict was reached. Gee, I wonder why? Probably because he's guilty as sin.


3 posted on 06/14/2005 7:36:01 AM PDT by Firefigher NC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asphalt

1 to 1 Jackson puts out an album called "VINDICATION" and a video of him 100 foot tall acting like a Superhero who destroys the "evil" Tom Sneddon while children scream "We love you Michael"!


4 posted on 06/14/2005 7:36:07 AM PDT by EdHallick ("KAAAAAAAAAAHN!" - Capt. James T. Kirk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdHallick

sounds plausible


5 posted on 06/14/2005 7:37:30 AM PDT by Asphalt (Join the NFL ping list ... All thing football ... FReepmail Asphalt to get on or off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: American Butterfly

My opinion, that most seem to disagree with, is that in this particular case Jacko is innocent. The prosecution had one of the crappiest cases ever. however, I would say that it is more than likely that in the past he has molested boys. It all sounds rather fishy.


6 posted on 06/14/2005 7:38:50 AM PDT by Asphalt (Join the NFL ping list ... All thing football ... FReepmail Asphalt to get on or off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Asphalt

Michael Jackson is online this morning sending a 55 gallon drum of Vasoline to Sneddon.


7 posted on 06/14/2005 7:39:29 AM PDT by chambley1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Firefigher NC
CNN noted he looked "stunned" when the verdict was reached

He's knows God is going to get him. BTW That's no umbrella it's a lightning rod.

8 posted on 06/14/2005 7:39:55 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Firefigher NC

I wonder if he knows which muscles in his face make a "stunned" look anymore ?


9 posted on 06/14/2005 7:40:45 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: American Butterfly
The reasonings for their verdict was pathetic and appalling.

The reasonings for their verdict were perfectly understandable, given the behavior of the mother and the lack of evidence that MJ did anything to her kid.

Jackson molested children, but the prosecution simply didn't prove that he molested this child.

And that's really unfortunate.

10 posted on 06/14/2005 7:41:02 AM PDT by sinkspur (If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Asphalt
Congratulations?

I hope they meant that sarcastically or did they also congratulate OJ after he turned his ex-wife into a human facsimile of a Pez dispenser?

11 posted on 06/14/2005 7:41:40 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (Out of the mainstream..........................and better off for it!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Butterfly

"I watched the jurors being interviewed and it was like taking a train ride into idiot land with no stops. They couldn't even put two sentences together to save their butts. The reasonings for their verdict was pathetic and appalling."

jury of his piers


12 posted on 06/14/2005 7:42:20 AM PDT by bnelson44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

It wasn't about the mother damn. So, you're saying that if a child has a crappy mother, the child should not be believed, therefore, no justice? What kind of bullsh*t is that????


13 posted on 06/14/2005 7:43:24 AM PDT by American Butterfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: American Butterfly

Did you by any chance see the interview with the jury foreman on the Nancy Grace show? She was disgusted, and so was I--and by the time she was done with him, I do believe he looked a little ashamed of himself. (And well he should have.) The question she kept asking was, What on earth did he think a man in his 40s doing in bed with little boys who weren't his own all those night. He wouldn't give a straight answer--but it was obvious he thought the same thing I did--he was molesting the children. YET, he voted "not guilty" on all counts.


14 posted on 06/14/2005 7:44:19 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: American Butterfly
>I watched the jurors being interviewed and it was like taking a train ride into idiot land with no stops. They couldn't even put two sentences together to save their butts. The reasonings for their verdict was pathetic and appalling

Maybe "our" country
is in worse shape than we think.
I mean, if these folks

are "average," how
can a country exist that's
by, for and of them?!

15 posted on 06/14/2005 7:45:41 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

"The reasonings for their verdict were perfectly understandable, given the behavior of the mother and the lack of evidence that MJ did anything to her kid."

I didn't follow it that closely, but that's the information I get. Not that MJ is totally innocent, just that there wasn't enough evidence in this one case.

I'm a rebel, especially when it comes to protecting people from filth like this. I would have voted him guilty not because of the preponderance of evidence, but because of the pattern.


16 posted on 06/14/2005 7:46:21 AM PDT by brownsfan (Post No Bills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

I saw that and I was appalled. Nancy Grace had his butt cornered and he totally couldn't take the heat. If you can't explain your verdict in depth and sound confident about it then something is wrong.


17 posted on 06/14/2005 7:46:41 AM PDT by American Butterfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Asphalt

One, I don't think this jury would have convicted him even if they'd had video of him committing the crimes. Two, once a child molester, always a child molester. They can't turn it off. Releasing him is a guarantee that more boys will be molested, and that it will be more difficult to prosecute him in the future. In fact, probably impossible.


18 posted on 06/14/2005 7:46:43 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Asphalt

Congratulations??????????????????????????


19 posted on 06/14/2005 7:46:59 AM PDT by OldFriend (MAJOR TAMMY DUCKWORTH.....INSPIRATIONAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

Don't know. Congrats that he escaped, reguardless of whether he was guilty.

If OJ really was framed, then he is the luckiest man in the world, and that was one heck of a frame. If he wasn't, which seemse far more than likely, then I feel very sorry for relatives of the wife.


20 posted on 06/14/2005 7:47:44 AM PDT by Asphalt (Join the NFL ping list ... All thing football ... FReepmail Asphalt to get on or off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 601-609 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson