Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JLS

What gets me is the guy admitted on National TV that he slept with boys, calling it the "most beautiful loving thing in the world"...So how did the jury reason this out? That sleeping with other peoples kids although strange, doesn`t prove molestation? Then I would assume if they feel he is safe enough to put back into society, then they wouldn`t mind their kids sleeping with him.


9 posted on 06/14/2005 2:15:40 AM PDT by EdHallick ("KAAAAAAAAAAHN!" - Capt. James T. Kirk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: EdHallick
What gets me is the guy admitted on National TV that he slept with boys, calling it the "most beautiful loving thing in the world"...So how did the jury reason this out? That sleeping with other peoples kids although strange, doesn`t prove molestation?

It should be pointed out that at least in some cases, this was a lot more innocent than it sounded. If a kid fell asleep in Jacko's bed while watching a movie, I don't think that's all that bad. I think Jackson is an idiot for phrasing this in such a way that it sounds like he's spooning ten-year-olds.

11 posted on 06/14/2005 2:23:52 AM PDT by garbanzo (Free people will set the course of history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: EdHallick
If you seen the interview with some of the people on the jury you can see why they set him free, none of them could explain, intellectually, what brought them to their conclusion.
28 posted on 06/14/2005 4:09:05 AM PDT by RetSignman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson