To: JLS
What gets me is the guy admitted on National TV that he slept with boys, calling it the "most beautiful loving thing in the world"...So how did the jury reason this out? That sleeping with other peoples kids although strange, doesn`t prove molestation? Then I would assume if they feel he is safe enough to put back into society, then they wouldn`t mind their kids sleeping with him.
9 posted on
06/14/2005 2:15:40 AM PDT by
EdHallick
("KAAAAAAAAAAHN!" - Capt. James T. Kirk)
To: EdHallick
What gets me is the guy admitted on National TV that he slept with boys, calling it the "most beautiful loving thing in the world"...So how did the jury reason this out? That sleeping with other peoples kids although strange, doesn`t prove molestation? It should be pointed out that at least in some cases, this was a lot more innocent than it sounded. If a kid fell asleep in Jacko's bed while watching a movie, I don't think that's all that bad. I think Jackson is an idiot for phrasing this in such a way that it sounds like he's spooning ten-year-olds.
11 posted on
06/14/2005 2:23:52 AM PDT by
garbanzo
(Free people will set the course of history)
To: EdHallick
If you seen the interview with some of the people on the jury you can see why they set him free, none of them could explain, intellectually, what brought them to their conclusion.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson