To: B4Ranch
I'm behind CAFTA. I just wish they hadn't felt it necessary to make special protections for American sugar because the trade off wasn't worth it.
8 posted on
06/13/2005 7:03:25 PM PDT by
Jaysun
(No matter how hot she is, some man, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t)
To: Jaysun
CAFTA has nothing really to do with sugar. Sugar is just a convenient boogeyman for the mainstream media to use to make the people angry and support CAFTA out of anger. If you read form USTR Robert Zoellicks speech of May 16 you will see that the purpose of CAFTA is to merge the the Central American countries with the North American Community, and ultimately the whole hemisphere. If our sellout leaders accomplish this, what form of government do you think the US will take? Certainly the Constitution will no longer apply because the "traders" are implenting through treaty and foreign aid a type of "civil society" where a corporatist fascism reigns and the voice of the people becomes the voice of the NGO.
This corporatist fascism is apparent in the lack of enforcement of US borders, the governmental elites( and it galls me that in America we have come to have an elite "class" in our government contrary to the purposes of our founders)find it convenient to ignore their duty to protect the country from invasion, and to uphold laws that they passed that deal with immigration and the permission to work in this country.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson