I don't know. Since that is not a theory established scientific disciplines support, I also don't care.
What is the underlying physical theory? It assumes among other things the constancy of the" laws" of time and space.
Since there is no such scientific theory, I'll assume this is irrelevant gobbeldy-gook.
Every speculation about the past, including the origin of life, is anachronistic.Evolution is a creation myth.
I assume we may eliminate geology and galactic astronomy from consideration, as well. About time astrology, flat-earth, and pyramid power theories got their day in court.
Evolution is still a creation myth. As the ID people have tried to point out, there are in favct two notions of evolution: the scientific theory which depends on evidence and Evolution, the myth which presumes things for which there is no present evidence.