Provisional underpinnings attend to all pursuits of human knowledge, including ID. Some disciplines are more willing to admit to their provisonal status than others. Astrology and evolution rank among those disciplines most abhorrent to admitting a lack of substance and exactitude. But that's okay. There's plenty of hind tit to go around. Your logic remains a wonder to behold. The fact that "all pursuits of human knowledge" have provisional underpinnings, still has squat to do with whether ID qualifies ID as a science. There is a distinct difference in the quality and quantity of painstakingly rigorous scientific effort behind evolutionary theory, and ID. ID is not a science, until, like evolutionary theory, it does science that stands up to the crucible of sceptical analysis, and repeated field verification--lots of it.
How can one verify or deny that life is the product of random motion? What is the underlying physical theory? It assumes among other things the constancy of the" laws" of time and space. Every speculation about the past, including the origin of life, is anachronistic.Evolution is a creation myth.