Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: shellshocked

"You have no evidence to base your claim Jackson was guilty..."

Wow! No evidence?! Wonder why there was a trial?


2,728 posted on 06/13/2005 7:32:35 PM PDT by Checkers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2660 | View Replies ]


To: Checkers
According to the "voice of reason", a videotape of MJ's next little boy victim of his "love" will be the only thing that can convict.

Otherwise we are all dooooomed to be convicted unfairly!LOL
2,730 posted on 06/13/2005 7:36:26 PM PDT by roses of sharon (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2728 | View Replies ]

To: Checkers

"Wonder why there was a trial?"

Excellent question. Try: Over zealous prosecutor looking to make a name for himself. Backfired, didn't it? All "evidence" presented was unbelievable witnesses and weak circumstantial evidence.

Why else did we have a trial? Because we don't lynch people because we heard media sound bites that got us all emotional to convict someone.


2,778 posted on 06/13/2005 8:43:12 PM PDT by shellshocked (They're undocumented Border Patrol agents, not vigilantes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2728 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson