Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AnAmericanMother

I think the book they are talking about, which is out of print, crosses the line. Naked little boys bent over with their bottoms to the camera? And these aren't little bitty boys, they looked preteen to me in the pics someone posted.

I think, in this day and age, having any questionable pics of naked children is asking for trouble.

I don't think the book, by itself, proves anything. It's a combination of things makes me think MJ is guilty.


2,710 posted on 06/13/2005 7:20:50 PM PDT by tuffydoodle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2703 | View Replies ]


To: tuffydoodle
I think, in this day and age, having any questionable pics of naked children is asking for trouble.

So . . . what's "questionable"? Any rear shot? The Coppertone girl? A whole genre of art pics should be burned? How about our shots of our kids in the tub? If a prosecutor is going to decide what's "questionable", ANYthing will be.

2,724 posted on 06/13/2005 7:31:54 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2710 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson