Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marajade

"I disagree. Its their job to look at the evidence. They didn't, they let their disdain for the mother by putting her on trial rather MJ, who was the defendant."

It's their job to look at the evidence as it's presented by BOTH sides. Not just the prosecutions side.

The DA presented the evidence as they saw it.

The defense did the same thing.

In this case...the defense did the better job.


2,382 posted on 06/13/2005 4:15:54 PM PDT by txradioguy (In Memory Of My Friend 1SG Tim Millsap A Co. 70th Eng. K.I.A. 25 April 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2365 | View Replies ]


To: txradioguy

In this case, the jurors believed the defense. That doesn't mean that MJ is innocent.


2,418 posted on 06/13/2005 4:21:55 PM PDT by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2382 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson