I agree - Michael Jackson is an obsessed pedophile who chooses his victims very carefully. The jury shouldn't have been swayed to the not guilty verdicts by the loony-tune mom. It is quite possible (and in this case fact) for the victim's mother to be a dishonest fraud artist AND for MJ to be guilty as charged. Criminals don't all operate in bastions of innocence and purity - they often victimize other criminals (in this case the mother), though the boy seems to be a truly innocent victim. MJ stalked and selected a weak victim (suffering from cancer at the time) with a despicable mother precisely because he thought they would never dare challenge him and would never win any legal case if they did. It is a travesty to see this calculating sociopath go free....
Very well said in post 1909.