To: cicero's_son
It's actually funny that anyone would take that stance. There have been plenty of cases over the years that excused the murderous acts of white supremacists/racists based on the fact that they were found "not guilty" by a jury of their peers. Are you actually making the claim that jury verdicts are infallible? Is it your position that second guessing a verdict is somehow subverting justice?
1,812 posted on
06/13/2005 2:59:49 PM PDT by
IoCaster
("That to live by one man's will became the cause of all men's misery." - Richard Hooker)
To: IoCaster
Heaven's no.
But I damn sure am more confident in this jury--which was racially mixed and generally considered "favorable" to the prosecution--than I am in a bunch of people who treated the entire thing as a soap opera.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson