In any case, there are numerous items this globalist cited to encourage us to abandon our country and our constitution, but this one seems as blatant a lie as any:
The U.S., Mexican, and Canadian governments remain zealous defenders of an outdated conception of sovereignty even though their citizens are ready for a new approach. Each nation's leadership has stressed differences rather than common interests. North America needs leaders who can articulate and pursue a broader vision.
Fact of the matter is, if anything, it's turned inside out. But what the hey, the CFR puppetmasters' and their minions' ends justify the means right? FWIW, I actually read most of the piece and for the life of me, I couldn't find any justification(that stood out at least) for advocating the "United States of North America". But I did read it in a hurry.
I've even considered some what ifs, like, what if the United States of North Ameirca" were to adopt a constitution essentially the same as our own. Would that make a difference? Then I thought what the hell, we aren't operating under our constitution now, so no dice. We have already abdicated our individual sovereignty to a centralized government monster. Question is, can we recover it?
FGS