To: jmc813
As a Canadian, I'm anxious to see the conservative/FReeper response to this, specifically regarding this line:
"Conservatives who have been critical of the UN in the past have enthusiastically embraced this bill and the concept of UN reform."
9 posted on
06/13/2005 11:06:15 AM PDT by
Stevieboy
To: Stevieboy
"What does this mean? The official adoption of this definition by the United Nations would have the effect of making resistance to any government or any international organization an international crime. It would make any attempt to overthrow a government an international causus belli for UN military action. Until this point a sovereign government retained the legal right to defend against or defeat any rebellion within its own territory."
Yea, we got a major HELLO??? here and I guess everyone who has eyes to see has long since gone some where.....else?
11 posted on
06/13/2005 11:12:57 AM PDT by
Esther Ruth
(Tell me I am wrong.... and everything is fine......)
To: Stevieboy; hedgetrimmer; JesseJane
I know many on here were critical of Ron Paul for his stance on this. Guess this explains it.
12 posted on
06/13/2005 11:13:35 AM PDT by
monkeywrench
(Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
To: Stevieboy
"Conservatives who have been critical of the UN in the past have enthusiastically embraced this bill and the concept of UN reform." UN conservative is an oxymoron, as unconservative as a loopy leftist moonbat. HTH.
17 posted on
06/13/2005 11:44:06 AM PDT by
Milhous
To: Stevieboy
As a Canadian, I'm anxious to see the conservative/FReeper response to thisAs a longtime poster and lurker on these threads, I would be quite surprised if the first "criticism" doesn't take the form of brainless ad hominem attacks of Ron Paul. That's what people usually do when they can't back up their arguments.
18 posted on
06/13/2005 11:47:40 AM PDT by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson