[inquest]

I prefer getting out of the UN, replacing it with nothing, beefing up the American military, intervening unilaterally whenever and wherever the USA sees fit with the assistance of freedom-loving nations who want their part of the honor. I also favor refusing to acknowledge fraudulent claims of neo-NevilleChamberlains to the name "conservative" with or without prefixes. Cowardice as national policy is not conservatism. I also believe in aggressively attacking such fraudulent claims and claimants.

You forgot to mention one thing: You also don't believe in having to back up wild charges.

[BlackElk]

I have and as I have told you about seventeen times, I am not your research assistant. I want people to experience the full despicability of paleocowardicism by accessing Lavender Raimondo's antiwar.com and Chronicles.com. Then they can scan to their heart's content and appreciate (not from my editorial views) the words from each east end of a horse heading west for what they are, standing on their own. Your intellect being sufficiently limited to mistake paleowhateverism for noble conservatism, what makes you think I or ANY conservative would have ANY reason to care for your opinions.

Despise me. Considering the source, it is refreshing. If I found myself agreeing with you, I would have cause to be concerned. McGovernism is NOT conservatism. Chamberlainism is NOT conservatism.