Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale

LOLOL! I really should proof read. No, it should have been methodological.


64 posted on 06/13/2005 9:14:31 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Alamo-Girl
That was my guess. I wanted to mention that each epochial insight has been at the same time the use of a new method. That is roughly equivalent to a new way of thinking. For example, we have been laboring under Einstein's remarkable papers of 1905 for a hundred years. There is nothing epochial about any of the insights discovered under special relativity or brownian motion or the photoelectric effect once the basic idea was published. Use of a method is more of an engineering application than science, which should probably include the scientific method as well.

What we should look for--new method. New way of thinking.

68 posted on 06/13/2005 9:21:57 AM PDT by RightWhale (I know nothing, and less every day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson