Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TMSuchman
In my reaserch there was less than 10% of the South owned slaves and that the practice was coming to an end.

Replaced by what? There were almost 4 million slaves.

97 posted on 06/13/2005 8:07:19 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

The policy was falling out of favor, & the blacks that were there were free people who worked the land for part of the crops, and a sense for belonging. Was it right to own another person, NO it is not, and this way of living was coming to an end befoe the war had started. It was only the extermly large plantions had owned slaves, but that was costing more money to keep them there forcefully, but instead if the had wanted to stay that made the job easier. Why whip a person into submission, when you could entice them into staying by choice. They would produce much more in the way of crops, timber ect... by choice not by force.


116 posted on 06/13/2005 8:22:05 AM PDT by TMSuchman (2nd Generation U.S. MARINE, 3rd Generation American & PROUD OF IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson