Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rustbucket
I think a more correct characterization of Nevada at the time would have been that it only had about 15,000 residents and that was really too small to shoulder the burdens of state government, taxation, etc.

The population of Nevada in 1870 was about 43,000. Over 12,000 people voted in the statehood referendum in 1864. Your 15,000 population is wishful thinking, as is your conspiracy about Nevada statehood to begin with. Lincoln got 212 electoral votes in 1864 to McClellans 21. He didn't need Nevada's three.

681 posted on 06/16/2005 4:46:24 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 680 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
From MSN Encarta (Believe this or Bill Gates will get mad):

Congress and the Lincoln administration, however, saw Nevada statehood as additional support for the 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution (which outlawed slavery) and for Lincoln's upcoming reelection. The U.S. Congress quickly passed the Nevada Enabling Act in March 1864 and by summer a new constitutional convention was convened.

Here's another source that mentions Nevada's inadequate (for statehood) population (State of Nevada, Department of Cultural Affairs):

Thus, Nevada, with a population less than required for statehood by the Northwest Ordinance, entered the union as the 36th state. The designation "Battle Born State" is appropriate inasmuch as Nevada's entry was a result of the Civil War and the accompanying problems.

Lincoln was nothing if not a schemer.

682 posted on 06/16/2005 7:22:24 PM PDT by rustbucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 681 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson