Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexConfederate1861
Regardless what the pro-slavery people wanted, slavery wouldn't have lasted.

So how would it have ended, short of a war? Slaveholder had a lot of their capital sunk into their slaves, a field hand could sell for $1500 in 1860. How would the South have freed a third of their population without a fight? And if slavery's natural end was just around the corner, why did the Confederate constitution forbid any state from ending it on its own? So much for "State's Rights".

63 posted on 06/13/2005 7:43:08 AM PDT by LWalk18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: LWalk18
"And if slavery's natural end was just around the corner, why did the Confederate constitution forbid any state from ending it on its own?"

Can you direct me to the section that forbids a state ending the practice?
156 posted on 06/13/2005 8:55:20 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: LWalk18

Economically, slavery was almost at an end, even though the planters didn't want to admit it. The Industrial Revolution would have forced an end to slave labor.


205 posted on 06/13/2005 10:44:46 AM PDT by TexConfederate1861 (Sic Semper Tyrannis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson