Skip to comments.
US bubble set to burst - [physicists predict burst of housing bubble in 22 states]
PhysicsWeb ^
| June 7, 2005
| Belle Dumé
Posted on 06/12/2005 11:48:33 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-146 next last
To: DoughtyOne
Hell, scare enough people with this kind of talk and it's rather a self-fulfilling prophesy.
I'm still shocked at the house across the street from us.. On the market for $512,000 for five months now, he's sold the house five times, each time the buyer backs out before the end of escrow. He bought the house four years ago for $310,000 - a hefty profit if he could ever get someone to actually get someone to buy it.
Been in our house for twelve years, bought it for $165,000. Someone asks me about my retirement plan, I tell them I'm living in it. Yeah, I expect the bubble to burst - I think it already has. Far too many properties around me are up for sale whereas eight months ago the Realtors never bothered to put up a sign - it was usually sold before the ink was dry on the listing papers.
41
posted on
06/13/2005 1:21:05 AM PDT
by
kingu
To: kingu
42
posted on
06/13/2005 1:23:21 AM PDT
by
durasell
(Friends are so alarming, My lover's never charming...)
To: Grim
You make some good points. However, the data analyzed by the two physicists announce the presence of what they call 'faster-than-exponential growth' in the real estate markets they looked at. Faster-than-exponential growth is the mark of a bubble and is unsustainable by any physical process. Their success in predicting the decline of the U.K. housing market is no guarantee that they're going to be correct this time, but their current analysis certainly warrants attention, it seems to me. I haven't read their paper, though. If I can find some quiet time, I'm going to try to work through some of their paper in the next day or so.
To: durasell
California - the eastern end of the San Gabriel Valley to be specific. If the homes on my street are really worth $360,000, I'd be shocked. A $160,000 upcharge from that is just insane.
44
posted on
06/13/2005 1:30:55 AM PDT
by
kingu
To: snarks_when_bored
"track record"?
You need more than one point to create a line.
45
posted on
06/13/2005 1:34:36 AM PDT
by
stands2reason
(It's 2005, and two wrongs still don't make a right.)
To: stands2reason
"Track record" is too strong, you're correct. Let's say, their "previous successful prediction".
To: snarks_when_bored
Sizing the US market by using a formulae for the exfoliating UK market and any other- is inane. Regardless, Buffet is fella to listen to after the fact- just try to follow him before the fact, see how that works for ya. The US housing market will continue to boom towards a sustained leveling; unless one or more, of three events happen- none of them good scenarios- then all bets are off.
47
posted on
06/13/2005 1:39:02 AM PDT
by
Treader
(Hillary's dark smile is reminiscent of Stalin's inhuman grin...)
To: snarks_when_bored
I blame Greenspan... rates were ridiculously low for too long, I just hope we have a soft landing.
48
posted on
06/13/2005 1:45:38 AM PDT
by
Mikse
To: Mikse
Greenspan's real legacy might be a real estate meltdown, like the early 90s -- but bigger.
The only thing keeping the prices up at this point is hype and a rapidly dwindling supply of greater fools.
49
posted on
06/13/2005 1:51:06 AM PDT
by
durasell
(Friends are so alarming, My lover's never charming...)
To: snarks_when_bored
Moreover, the models were able to predict the critical turning point at which these bubbles might burst after which time the high prices may slowly start to come back down to more realistic levels or stabilise at their current levels. Did anybody else read that definition of "bursting the bubble"? To reiterate, according to that paragraph, it means that prices would slowly retreat or else stabilize at their current levels, not that they would crash by 50% as some are breathlessly claiming.
50
posted on
06/13/2005 3:14:52 AM PDT
by
The Electrician
("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
To: The Electrician
The Nasdaq tech bubble burst in March of 2000:

If the real estate market behaves similarly, there will be big trouble. But perhaps it won't be quite that bad.
To: A CA Guy
That will piss off all those states who are getting gigantic raises in revenues from the huge property tax income.Just because the values drop doesn't mean they are going to adjust the assessments.
52
posted on
06/13/2005 3:29:27 AM PDT
by
raybbr
To: snarks_when_bored
E=mc2
Therefore, the U.S. bubble will burst. Makes complete sense to me.
53
posted on
06/13/2005 3:34:47 AM PDT
by
advance_copy
(Stand for life, or nothing at all)
To: advance_copy
E=mc2Therefore, the U.S. bubble will burst. Makes complete sense to me.
You're ignoring higher-order terms...
To: snarks_when_bored
Everything is relative :-)
55
posted on
06/13/2005 3:41:29 AM PDT
by
advance_copy
(Stand for life, or nothing at all)
To: The Electrician
Moreover, the models were able to predict the critical turning point at which these bubbles might burst after which time the high prices may slowly start to come back down to more realistic levels or stabilise at their current levels. No one in his right mind would call a large increase in price stabilizing at a high level a "bubble".
56
posted on
06/13/2005 3:42:22 AM PDT
by
wotan
To: advance_copy
Everything is relative :-)
Yeah, that's what my Tennessee kinfolk used to say.
To: spetznaz
58
posted on
06/13/2005 3:47:41 AM PDT
by
metesky
(President; The People's Committee Against People's Committees)
To: snarks_when_bored
59
posted on
06/13/2005 3:48:45 AM PDT
by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
To: AntiGuv
Twenty years ago, when I first bought property in Maine, the Yankee gentleman I bought from (one of the last
real Downeasters left) gave me a maxim to live by as far as Maine RE goes:
"Maine, last to know, first to go."
60
posted on
06/13/2005 3:53:13 AM PDT
by
metesky
(President; The People's Committee Against People's Committees)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-146 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson