Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Rep. Randy "Duke")Cunningham defends deal with defense firm's owner
San Diego Union Tribune ^ | 6/12/05 | Marcus Stern

Posted on 06/12/2005 12:14:04 PM PDT by nj26

A defense contractor with ties to Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham took a $700,000 loss on the purchase of the congressman's Del Mar house while the congressman, a member of the influential defense appropriations subcommittee, was supporting the contractor's efforts to get tens of millions of dollars in contracts from the Pentagon.

Mitchell Wade bought the San Diego Republican's house for $1,675,000 in November 2003 and put it back on the market almost immediately for roughly the same price. But the Del Mar house languished unsold and vacant for 261 days before selling for $975,000.

Meanwhile, Cunningham used the proceeds of the $1,675,000 sale to buy a $2.55 million house in Rancho Santa Fe. And Wade, who had been suffering through a flat period in winning Pentagon contracts, was on a tear – reeling in tens of millions of dollars in defense and intelligence-related contracts.

In an interview Wednesday, Cunningham conceded that the circumstances surrounding the transaction could raise "fair" questions, but he insisted that the real estate deal was legitimate and independent of his efforts to help Wade win contracts.

"My whole life I've lived aboveboard," Cunningham said. "I've never even smoked a marijuana cigarette. I don't cheat. If a contractor buys me lunch and we meet a second time, I buy the lunch. My whole life has been aboveboard and so this doesn't worry me."

Later, he added, "The last thing I would do is get involved in something that, you know, is wrong. And I feel very confident that I haven't done anything wrong."

Wade was traveling without access to a telephone last week, according to Scotty Brumett, an official of Wade's company, MZM Inc. Brumett said Wade purchased the two-story, four-bedroom, three-and-a-half-bath residence to raise MZM's corporate profile in San Diego.

(Excerpt) Read more at signonsandiego.com ...


TOPICS: US: California
KEYWORDS: 109th; congress; desperatedems; dukecunningham; ethics; mitchellwade; mzm; randycunningham
Although Cunningham is a solid conservative, this looks poorly-advised to me. It looks like a $700,000 bribe.

If anybody wants to prove me wrong, I welcome it.

1 posted on 06/12/2005 12:14:04 PM PDT by nj26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nj26

I'm afraid this looks an awful lot like a duck and it's quacking too. I'm surprised the paper didn't lead with "REPUBLICAN".

At any rate, if it was above board, then it should be a simple matter to prove that it wasn't sold above apraised value at the time. Also, why did the contractor turn around and put it on the market so quickly?

I can tell you if a government contracting officer did the same thing, someone would be reading him his rights about now.


2 posted on 06/12/2005 12:22:52 PM PDT by NavVet (“Benedict Arnold was wounded in battle fighting for America, but no one remembers him for that.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavVet

"I'm surprised the paper didn't lead with "REPUBLICAN"."

The San Diego Union Tribune is a family-owned paper, and among the more conservative papers in California.


3 posted on 06/12/2005 12:24:01 PM PDT by nj26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nj26

Nothing of the sort. The guy bought some real estate on speculation and took a loss on it. Happens all the time. As for his companyy getting defense contracts, we're in a war. Defense spending goes up in a war.

The MSM focuses on minor stuff like this while turning a blind eye to what the Demorats do, which is 100 times worse. Remember Whitewater? Whatever happened about that? When they start investiagating the Rats, then maybe I'll worry about the minor things Republicans do. Until then, I don't care.


4 posted on 06/12/2005 12:29:39 PM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nj26

Let's see if this story has 'legs'. I suspect if Bill & Hill did this we'd see an initial report, and then the story would die -- nobody would 'pick it up'. Of course, Cunningham is a conservative & a republican, so the rules are different.

BTW, a 700,000 loss on a home in this area might not be unusual. That is a crazy market.


5 posted on 06/12/2005 12:37:14 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

I think it would be cleared up in a second, whenever the price of the house is compared with the "worth" of the house...


6 posted on 06/12/2005 12:42:03 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

What is strange to me is why is a corporation buying a single family house in Del Mar? And, if you read the entire article, it also seems as if the transaction was structured to reduce transparency (by using dummy corporation names.)

This is a Republican district, but it's not fail-safe. Cunningham got 58% of the vote in 2004. If there is wrongdoing here, we should get another conservative on the ballot so we don't lose the seat to the Democrats.


7 posted on 06/12/2005 12:42:09 PM PDT by nj26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

The comps will help tell the story. If somebody can come up with a zip code then we can check. The value of that house is probably pretty well established.
This sounds like a "cattle gate" type of deal.
Duke went to the Delmar track..and somehow bought only winning tickets..


8 posted on 06/12/2005 12:43:45 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

"Duke went to the Delmar track..and somehow bought only winning tickets.."

I cannot wait until Hillary's first presidential debate in 2008. I'm dying to hear her explanation of her commodities-trading expertise. I just hope we nominate a candidate with the guts to put her on the spot about it.


9 posted on 06/12/2005 12:51:12 PM PDT by nj26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nj26
If there is wrongdoing here, we should get another conservative on the ballot so we don't lose the seat to the Democrats.

Wasn't Cunningham making noises about retirement during the last election cycle? This could be a case of 'getting paid for services rendered' just prior to retirement.

10 posted on 06/12/2005 12:51:25 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nj26

LOL! Which isn't saying much!


11 posted on 06/12/2005 12:52:13 PM PDT by TheDon (Euthanasia is an atrocity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

Don't do the RATS work for them. If FReepers want to focus on scandals, the bad guys have plenty for us to look at.


12 posted on 06/12/2005 12:57:14 PM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NavVet

What did Randy do for them?


13 posted on 06/12/2005 6:05:56 PM PDT by Whispering Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NavVet
Randy is not a contracting officer and I'm sure you know Government contracting officers cannot be influenced by Congress critters however maybe their bosses can.
14 posted on 06/12/2005 6:08:59 PM PDT by Whispering Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nj26
"I've never even smoked a marijuana cigarette."

Poor choice of words considering his son's a convicted pot smuggler.

15 posted on 06/12/2005 6:09:47 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nj26

Duke is done. He should resign now.


16 posted on 06/13/2005 6:06:40 AM PDT by Jimbaugh (They will not get away with this. Developing . . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balch3
Where do you live? Oklahoma. There are no homes in San Diego County that are sold at a loss! By the way, after spending millions of dollars and years investigating Whitewater the Republicans were forced to admit there was no wrongdoing by the Clintons in Whitewater. I doubt the current Congress will spend 50 cents investigating what was an obvious bribe
17 posted on 06/16/2005 11:23:39 PM PDT by sflop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: balch3
Nothing of the sort. The guy bought some real estate on speculation and took a loss on it. Happens all the time. As for his companyy getting defense contracts, we're in a war. Defense spending goes up in a war.

You have got to be kidding me. This wasn't speculation, this was buying a house for $700,000 above its value, then trying to unload it a month later. This was a defense contractor bribing an influential member of the Appropriations Committee and suddenly finding himself getting as many defense contracts as he can handle.

This is a Congressman selling his office to line his own pockets. I don't know what's sadder - when one of our own goes bad or the number of "conservatives" who are willing to overlook such corruption because the crook has an (R) after his name.

18 posted on 07/03/2005 4:11:03 PM PDT by highball ("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nj26
Has he tried the EDI defense? If works for the Dems. After all Everybody Does It. What other reason is there to get into politics and screw up the world if it isn't to make a lot of money.
19 posted on 07/03/2005 4:13:57 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson