To: Clara Lou
I wonder why anyone would object to the owner of a web site, such as this one, running it as he/she sees fit?
To: Cincinnatus
Lucianne spent a good deal of her time shutting off TVs in the hospital to protect the patients, but there was no avoiding it for her. She went around the hospital turning off TV's? Was that just in the visiting areas, or did she invade people's rooms in order to "protect" them from the news as well?
13 posted on
06/12/2005 6:06:23 AM PDT by
veronica
To: Cincinnatus
Nobody says she hasn't a right to do what she wants with her website.
Personally, I'm just glad that someone who was not only shutting down discussion on her website, but actively "running around shutting off TV's" in the hospital while her husband was dying, isn't in charge of the FCC.
I don't visit her site and don't know where she stands on the Terri Schiavo issue. Anybody?
To: Cincinnatus
I wonder why anyone would object to the owner of a web site, such as this one, running it as he/she sees fit? The ownership of property conveys a range of legal and moral rights. However, it's quite possible for behavior to be perfectly legal, morally correct and really annoying all at the same time.
17 posted on
06/12/2005 6:21:47 AM PDT by
prion
(Yes, as a matter of fact, I AM the spelling police)
To: Cincinnatus
I wonder why anyone would object to the owner of a web site, such as this one, running it as he/she sees fit?
The following is the comment with which I agreed: Lucianne and her staff run that site in a capricious and arbitrary manner
What part of the above do you not comprehend? How much more clearly can the objection be stated?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson