To: TheOtherOne
I'm amazed that the child is now almost 2 years old and has no name. Idiots.
4 posted on
06/11/2005 11:34:28 PM PDT by
Kirkwood
To: Kirkwood
I'm amazed that the child is now almost 2 years old and has no name. Idiots. Silly you. You thought 'normal' parents would be selling their baby's name.
To: Kirkwood
That's the epitome of selfishness.
To not even feel the need to give your child a sound of personalization is almost neglectful.
I believe that it was Mark Twain who stated that the sweetest sound to any person is the sound of his/her own name. Whether we really like the name or have just come to associate it with ourself, it becomes an almost tangible part of a person. To not give this deep-seeded connection to a personalized sound seems to be an act of unconcern for that child.
15 posted on
06/12/2005 1:05:35 AM PDT by
bannie
(The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
To: Kirkwood
I'm amazed that the child is now almost 2 years old and has no name. Idiots. Liberals
24 posted on
06/12/2005 1:47:26 PM PDT by
Born Conservative
("If not us, who? And if not now, when? - Ronald Reagan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson