Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LowCountryJoe
"I never heard you once refute the accusation I levied against you. Do you wish to be one of the elites at the seats of power who plans the economy while you also, and at the same time, chide the despotic 'leadership' of the PRC? "

Gee, it almost sounds like you are defending that despotic leadership.

I am perfectly content to be one of the majority of 300 million Americans who thinks that we should be looking out for our nation and its own people's security and well-being. Not risking all on a fool's bet. I don't need to be whispering behind the chairs at the seat of power, as I believe that power comes from the People. Right now, the voice of the People appears conflicted, and confused. And if the People resolve that a Hamiltonian approach would serve them best, then all other, conflicting approaches and their advocates better get the hell out of the way.

Meantime, my "optimistic" libertarian friend, would you leave us with a government which punishes success and hard work, and savings, and innovation? I have always advocated replacing the income tax, personal, corporate and capital gains taxes, with a national sales tax of 15% and a revenue tariff of 25% or so. Plus, I strongly urge revoking China's MFN status, and letting Smoot-Hawley automatically kick in at a 50% tariff against them.

I believe that this fiscal-sourcing switch would have some dramatic effects and would restore American competitiveness across a broad swath of industries, encourage U.S. innovation, pouring back investments here at home...rewarding savings, earnings, and punishing consumption.

My largest concern is that the demand for these healthful changes will come too late to be effectual. It is always better to keep the horse in the barn, rather than try to coax it back in later.

100 posted on 06/20/2005 4:39:19 PM PDT by Paul Ross (George Patton: "I hate to have to fight for the same ground twice.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: Paul Ross; 1rudeboy; Toddsterpatriot
...would you leave us with a government which punishes success and hard work, and savings, and innovation?

That's not my style at all!

I believe that power comes from the People. Right now, the voice of the People appears conflicted, and confused. And if the People resolve that a Hamiltonian approach would serve them best

Better dig a little deeper in your Chernov book. That Founding Father that you show so much adoration for didn't really have the people's liberty in mind...maybe you're not into "that kind of thing" either.

I believe that this fiscal-sourcing switch would have some dramatic effects and would restore American competitiveness across a broad swath of industries, encourage U.S. innovation, pouring back investments here at home...rewarding savings, earnings, and punishing consumption.

Maybe hell, you're definitely not into liberty; sickening.

102 posted on 06/20/2005 5:10:06 PM PDT by LowCountryJoe (50 states, and their various laws, will serve 'we, the people' better than just one LARGE state can)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson