Posted on 06/11/2005 8:58:10 AM PDT by FeeinTennessee
You makes your bed you sleeps in it.
This article loses credibility when it says Hannity "inadvertently" crossed the border. Hannity told listeners he knew exactly what he was doing when he stepped through the border fence, and that the border officials had told him there was a three foot buffer zone beyond the fence.
That's funny; I put your title in the title search window, and instantly I got:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1420356/posts
I agree that the ACLU is disgraceful, but I disagree that they are on the ropes. They have had many victories in court. The most recent to have film and pictures from Abu Ghraib released.
I haven't heard if the government plans to appeal. Also, this will be another orgy of media military and Bush bashing.
Bush has been so passive and weak lately, I'm not optimistic that they have a smart plan for dealing with this.
I know the title makes it seem like the ACLU is faltering, but check out the article at the link.
You are right, they are as aggressive as ever. The Bush administration DOES need to address the issue.
It's all about the judges.
The founder of the ACLU said "The American people will never knowingly adopted socialism. But under the name of liberalism they wil adopt every precept of socialism." His stated goal was always to eradicate Christianity from the US.
Do a Google search on the founder of the ACLU. It will curl your hair.
Well, that's something. I can't always be sure someone hasn't already put this up.
The founder of the ACLU said "The American people will never knowingly adopted socialism. But under the name of liberalism they wil adopt every precept of socialism." His stated goal was always to eradicate Christianity from the US.
Do a Google search on the founder of the ACLU. It will curl your hair.
Oh yes...I know about them.
ACLU lawyers are not pro-bono as we understand the term. When they win a case, they are awarded "reasonable and customary" fees...this is the threat they hold over people. They sue you and then make you pay their salary.
But when they lose, they don't have to pay for the defendant's fees. That's something we could change that would help...
They are also part of Soros' army.
Bush really knots 'yer shorts?
Yes, you can IF the earlier poster followed the rules and used the exact title of its original site, and IF you put THAT in the search window for Title/Date...
Did you even notice the search window near the top of http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/browse ?
A while back in Indiana there came up a questionable issue and a city government asked the Indiana ACLU if there would be a problem if the city took a certain action. The ACLU publicly said they had no problems with what the city proposing and the city then enacted the new law.
The ACLU then sued and that told me all I needed to know about the ACLU.
Ever look at their structure? Every Freeper and Conservative in the nation could join and outnumber the libs ten to one yet it is nearly impossible to change the leadership from the grass roots, AARP is pretty much the same way as well.
Maybe I'm out of line here... but, why don't we take these people on below the belt. Destroy their credibility by exposing their personal lives. Or has this been tried? Or does anyone care?
Fight fire with fire, I have often wondered about that myself.
From others, I've always felt they were correct ACLU stood for:
Against Christianity Liberty Unity
or
American Criminal Liars Union
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.