Damn straight! I believe his opinion was a dagger in the heart of our hope to restore the foundation of limited government. If he can't side with the Constitution even if means going against some previous misguided precedent then where are we, what is our hope.
Actually, the poster above who referred to Congress is probably more near the solution. The Supreme Court is usually the "caboose" of the three cars of government. The President and Congress are more suited for leading sentiment/policy while the Supremes usually follow public sentiment/policy. (I am not saying that the Supremes never lead--abortion and homo rights being examples--only that they usually follow).