Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: expatpat; pigdog; EternalVigilance; Mad Dawgg

Good. Pigdog apparently does, though.

Are you agreeing that 19-20% is the more proper revenue-neutral rate as should be implemented for the FairTax legislation? or do you have a better estimate of current conditions, not those existing back in the Clinton era.

Remember, I asked you for your estimate of revenue neutral rate for the FairTax, not mine, and the best common measure to use to represent it for comparison with other tax plans competing with the NRST like "Flat Tax", Business Transaction Tax, VAT or some lesser modification of the current income tax system.

Still looking for your answers. Seems to me discussion depends on laying out where everyone stands on the NRST rate and whether or not the proposed value in the legislation means anything other than a provisional place holder and going from there.

That, to me, is the best way to get the board cleared, and discuss merits rather than continual digressions on the trivial.

954 posted on 06/12/2005 5:14:02 PM PDT by ancient_geezer (Don't reform it, Replace it!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 942 | View Replies ]


To: ancient_geezer
That, to me, is the best way to get the board cleared, and discuss merits rather than continual digressions on the trivial.

A-blessed-men!!

957 posted on 06/12/2005 5:17:21 PM PDT by groanup (our children sleep soundly, thank-you armed forces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 954 | View Replies ]

To: ancient_geezer

see 959


967 posted on 06/12/2005 5:38:07 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 954 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson