Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pigdog
No need ... not applicable.

Denying history doesn't make it go away or make people change their behavior.

635 posted on 06/11/2005 10:34:25 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomCalls
Denying history doesn't make it go away or make people change their behavior.

You still beating the 'Articles of Confederation' horse? That's one of the weakest tactics I've seen the SQLs use yet.

To believe it, you'd have to believe that the federal government is too weak to carry out its wishes, as was the American government under the Articles.

Absurd.

639 posted on 06/11/2005 10:44:15 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("Quality of life": Another name for the slippery slope into barbarism...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 635 | View Replies ]

To: FreedomCalls

Not denying history at all; just saying that the Articles of Confederation no longer apply (and applied to a completely different set of circumstances than today.

You're trying to whitewash a barn with red paint.


687 posted on 06/12/2005 7:30:59 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 635 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson