No, you're trying to avoid what my argument is: that the nrst will tax big spenders more than now. That's one of the things that allows many people to pay less - broadening of the base being another.
The big spenders could pay as much as 23%. The less you spend, the less your tax. So you could save and pay less tax. You could give to charity and pay less tax... maybe ancient_geezer would post a graph illustrating effective rates by $ spent...?
Why mislead? Is that all you've got?
You could give to charity and pay less tax... maybe ancient_geezer would post a graph illustrating effective rates by $ spent...?
Ohhh, I suppose that might be possible ;O)
Figure 5: Annual expenditures vs. FairTax effective tax rates, for a family of four
