Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fido969
You are saying that folks will look at their invoice - but won't look at their paystub? What kind of half-assed excuse is that?

No I wasn't. That would be the same stupid thing as today. Simply listing it isn't what puts downward pressure on taxes - it's having to pay it. Pay it by pulling $10s and $20 out of your pocket. Let me reprint:

But if witholding were gone and we had to pay taxes with cash out of our pockets, would it increase resistance to higher taxes?"

So how about a little more time reading and a little less on the choice words?

And I will call anyone who peddles this scam as a way to reduce the tax burden of the average working family a baldfaced liar.

Good. You should do so if you have any reason whatsoever for thinking it. Do you care to share any of them?

266 posted on 06/10/2005 1:59:40 PM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]


To: Principled
Earned income credits allow many low income taxpayers to have no or negative income taxes. Consumption-based taxes based on a flat tax rate will result in a higher tax rate on those that spend most of their income on consumables, rather than those that invest a large part of their income, who are largely the more wealthy.

The money is going to come from somewhere. By reducing taxes that the wealthy pay - you MUST THEREFORE INCREASE the taxes that those who are not-wealthy would pay.

It's plain and simple logic. Which is why the Kool-Aid drinkers have so much trouble with the concept.
311 posted on 06/10/2005 3:09:16 PM PDT by Fido969 (I see Red People!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson