Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Your Nightmare
But under the current system, the John and the drug buyer paid income tax on the money they are giving to the prositute and drug dealer. They wouldn't under a NRST.

That's because the nrst doesn't tax any income.

One's entire tax burden is paid thru purchases at retail.

202 posted on 06/10/2005 1:13:18 PM PDT by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: Principled
That's because the nrst doesn't tax any income.

One's entire tax burden is paid thru purchases at retail.
Let me show you an example:

Current System - 20% Income Tax, 0% NRST
John makes $125, pays $25 in income taxes, and spends $100 on a prostitute. The prostitute pays no income tax or NRST on that $100.

Total revenue for the government = $25


NRST - 0% Income Tax, 20% inclusive NRST
John makes $125, pay no income tax, and spends $125 (prices go up for everyone) on a prostitute. The prostitute pays no income tax but pays $25 NRST when she spends the $125.

Total revenue for the government = $25
It's a wash.
260 posted on 06/10/2005 1:53:31 PM PDT by Your Nightmare (::tick:: ::tick:: ::tick::)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson