Posted on 06/09/2005 12:31:28 PM PDT by AzaleaCity5691
Judge again rules against McGinley, for Republicans Lawyer for disqualified candidate says tactic may be used against Roy Moore Thursday, June 09, 2005 By BRENDAN KIRBY Staff Reporter A federal judge in Mobile this week re-affirmed the Alabama Republican Party's right to kick a radio talk show host off its primary ballot last year, a ruling the plaintiffs' attorney warned could set up an attack against Roy Moore.
Kelly McGinley, whom the GOP barred from running for the state school board, sued the party, the secretary of state's office and elections officials in Mobile and Baldwin counties. Three Mobile County residents filed a separate lawsuit, alleging their voting rights had been violated.
The suits were consolidated into one case, and Chief U.S. District Judge Ginny Granade dis missed the complaint in October. She denied requests to reconsider that decision in March and again Monday.
Johnny Davis, an Ozark lawyer who represented the plaintiffs, said his clients have not decided whether to appeal the judgment. He said he worries that some leaders in the Republican Party will use the ruling as a legal basis to block Moore, the ousted state Su preme Court chief justice who has contemplated a challenge to Republican Gov. Bob Riley.
"We are very concerned about the precedent that was set," said Johnny Davis, who represented the plaintiffs.
Party Chairwoman Twinkle Andress Cavanaugh scoffed at that and accused outside interests of fanning suggestions that the party wants to get rid of Moore.
"That is an absolutely ridiculous statement," she said. "The Republican Party is in no way looking to kick off anyone who is a Republican."
The controversy began in April 2004 when the party's candidates committee disqualified McGinley from the ballot because she earlier had resigned from the Mobile County Republican Party Executive Committee and because she had advocated support of the Constitution Party on her Web site and her Brewton-based radio talk show.
Incumbent Randy McKinney of Orange Beach then took the nomination unopposed and went on to win a full term on the state Board of Education.
McGinley challenged her removal on grounds that the party violated its own rules by kicking her off the ballot without any fixed rule or practice.
Grenade dismissed that lawsuit in October, ruling that the state Supreme Court already had decided the issue. She also stated in her order that she would not second-guess the party's determination that McGinley violated a rule that candidates be "in accord with, and endorse, the principles and policies of the Republican Party."
The judge in March declined a request to reconsider that decision and also denied a second request to reconsider, this time based on the complaint made by Dorothy Smith, Richard Vining and Betty Vining, who contended that the party's decision to remove McGinley from the ballot effectively disenfranchised them.
"Voters have their own standing," Davis said. "They've got their own rights to come forward."
Assistant Attorney General John Park, who represented the defendants, said he would be ready if the plaintiffs decide to take their case to a higher court.
"The ball's in their court," he sad. "If they appeal, we'll contend that Judge Granade ruled correctly. Generally, if you've won at the lower level, you stand a pretty good chance at the higher levels."
"Actually, my hope is, by 2020, the words Republican Primary and Election will become indistinguishable"
LOL! HA! HA!...the GOP version of "Howie" Dean.
Both #11/12 posts make/have valid points...An educated voting populace is the answer, therefore accurate and reasoned discourse is necessary...one of the greatest things about FR... :/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.