[raivyn]

I need more info than this story gives. I would like them to define "sexually explicit". Maybe they were just bath-time photos... (doubtful, but I still need more info.) I have photos of both of my kids nekkid in the bath tub, but they are for posterity - not gratification. My parents took bath pics of me and my sister too.If they were taken for sexual gratification, then they should hang him by his peanuts with barbed wire.

[colorcountry]

We have pictures of 3 different generations of my family being bathed in the same kitchen sink. I think these photos must have been different. (I don't even want to know)

[areafiftyone]

I don't know. I know what you are talking about (the bath pictures and such) - but there's gotta be something more for the clerk to get suspicious about this.

[spectre]

I can't visualize what the "sexually explicit photographs" he took of his of his precious little grand daughter looked like. So I'll have to trust the authorities with this one.

sw

[Dengar01]

My friend works in the photo department at Walgreens. They are trained to distinguish the difference between child porn and bathtub photos. I would assume that CVS Pharmacy works the same. So this guy was most likely taking very disturbing photos and justly should be thrown into jail.

[conservativewasp]

I agree, but the 5 counts of posession of child porn tells me they found more when they busted him.