Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest
inquest wrote:

The thrust of his argument was the need for more power, not less.

Your own post at #3 contradicts you:

--- we have this excerpt from a 1785 letter from James Madison to James Monroe:
Much indeed is it to be wished, as I conceive, that no regulations of trade, that is to say, no restriction or imposts whatever, were necessary. A perfect freedom is the System which would be my choice. But before such a system will be eligible perhaps for the U. S. they must be out of debt; before it will be attainable, all other nations must concur in it.
3 posted on 06/09/2005 10:07:25 AM PDT by inquest

19 posted on 06/09/2005 6:14:38 PM PDT by P_A_I
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: P_A_I
Read on. He then goes on to say why his "wish" wouldn't fit the country's needs.
24 posted on 06/09/2005 7:48:56 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: P_A_I
The natural state of commerce is perfect freedom.

Consequently, any "regulation" of commerce implies some sort of restriction or prohibition. We "regulate" alcohol to prohibit its use by those under 21, for example.

28 posted on 06/09/2005 8:08:39 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson