Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ShadowAce

Well it made the point the end user(s) are liable. Just because your potatoes might be too small to attract a lawsuit, doesn't mean you're not criminally infringing, if Open Office does violate this same patent. Any reason it wouldn't?


57 posted on 06/09/2005 8:29:19 AM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Golden Eagle
Just because your potatoes might be too small to attract a lawsuit, doesn't mean you're not criminally infringing,...

OK. Point taken. However, OOo does not infringe. Check it out yourself. Here's the source code.

Even if you, personally, don't check it out, other people can, have, and will. OOo doesn'ty infringe. That's the strength and beauty of open source. It's all out in the open to prove there is no (intentional) infringing of anyone's IP. Once it's shown that some code may infringe ona patent somewhere, it's taken out immediately.

58 posted on 06/09/2005 8:47:27 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson