Skip to comments.
Social Security Plan's Support Dwindling. Most Don't Back Bush Idea, Poll Finds
Washington Post ^
| 6/9/05
| Richard Morin and Jim VandeHei
Posted on 06/08/2005 9:28:06 PM PDT by Crackingham
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: Crackingham
LOL! It's amazing Bush got 20 per cent of the vote when you considering these polls.
It's one negative poll after the other....LOL!
2
posted on
06/08/2005 9:30:44 PM PDT
by
zarf
To: Crackingham
The Washington comPost owns Newsweak.......Nuff said
3
posted on
06/08/2005 9:33:26 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
( By Comparison...."Dingy" Harry Reid makes Tom Daschle look like a Statesman)
To: MJY1288
Paid for IN CASH by Phillip Graham delivered by Bob Woodward.
4
posted on
06/08/2005 9:34:43 PM PDT
by
Howlin
(Up or down on Janice Brown!)
To: zarf
It claims there are guaranteed benefits that will be reduced. There is no such thing as guaranteed benefits. The Supreme Court has already ruled on that. Benefits are determined by congress every year in the budget.
5
posted on
06/08/2005 9:35:30 PM PDT
by
Ron in Acreage
(It's the borders stupid!)
To: zarf
All I've seen and heard are anti-SS reform commercials, Been bombarded with them.
Where in the heck are the commercials explaining and supporting the plan???
6
posted on
06/08/2005 9:35:59 PM PDT
by
lizma
To: Crackingham
The poll found that 56 percent said the president's plan to couple new personal retirement accounts with a reduction in guaranteed benefits for most Americans would cut the overall retirement income of seniors.They'd actually get an increase in benefits due to the privatization percentage.
The question is invalid. One would have to accept the wrong president.
This is a bogus poll.
To: Crackingham
PushPollagram for Ben Bradlee. PushPollagram for Ben Bradlee.
"Take this poll and shove it Stop Your other polls, too Stop"
8
posted on
06/08/2005 9:36:43 PM PDT
by
auboy
("Unfair" is in the eye of the bemoaner)
To: Crackingham
These polls numbers and bias have already been exposed by www.anklebitingpundits.com. As you'd expect from the Washington Post, most everything about this poll is fraudulent.
To: lizma
We've been getting PRO SS reform commercials here, by the Cato organization....they are REALLY Good!
10
posted on
06/08/2005 9:37:14 PM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(Our military......the world's HEROES!)
To: Howlin
Bush will win this fight, despite all the efforts by the Old Media
11
posted on
06/08/2005 9:37:45 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
( By Comparison...."Dingy" Harry Reid makes Tom Daschle look like a Statesman)
To: CivilWarguy
These polls numbers and bias have already been exposed by www.anklebitingpundits.com. As you'd expect from the Washington Post, most everything about this poll is fraudulent.Yeah! Look at what it actually says. It's all democrat talking points. None of it is correct.
To: Crackingham
Keep it simple and let the workers invest in their own accounts.
13
posted on
06/08/2005 9:39:01 PM PDT
by
Coleus
(God doesn't like moderates, Rev 3:15-16)
To: Howlin
About a third -- 32 percent -- said Bush's proposals would result in future retirees receiving more money.
At least a few are aware of compound interest. Liberals always rely on an uneducated and uninformed public.
14
posted on
06/08/2005 9:39:21 PM PDT
by
Ron in Acreage
(It's the borders stupid!)
To: Crackingham
The only true SS reform is eliminating the Ponzi scheme entirely. Anything else is a lie, all that changes is how blatant a lie we're given.
15
posted on
06/08/2005 9:41:35 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(The U.S. Constitution poses no serious threat to our form of government)
To: Crackingham
"with a reduction in guaranteed benefits for most Americans "
HUH? What a fallacy and lie to load on the Bush plan.
pollaganda to get the result they want ...
"Do you want this horrible plan that will make you eat dog food?" "Uh.... I dont know what dog food tastes like" "Let me repeat: This plan will make you die a horrible death, are you for or against it?" "well I dont want to die" "Okay, I'll put you down as against"
Media. Bias. Stinks.
16
posted on
06/08/2005 9:42:43 PM PDT
by
WOSG
(Liberating Iraq - http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com)
To: Crackingham
A negative Bush story by Jim VandeHei. What's new?
Most newspapers know enough not to assign the most biased, resentful, partisan guy to write story after story about what a terrible job Bush is doing in his presidency.
That's like paying Helen Thomas each time she submits the same article.
17
posted on
06/08/2005 9:48:14 PM PDT
by
MikeHu
To: MJY1288
Bush will win this fight, despite all the efforts by the Old Media What happens to the money after death is a catching issue. Most people don't know the politicians just keep all their money if they die early.
To: Crackingham
Bush needs to prove that is gives a damn about us normal every day citizens, and that means securing the border, until Bush stops the invasion of illegals his agenda is dead. And since Bush cares more about law breaker. rapists, murderers and invaders then is does about US citizens he is finished as president.
19
posted on
06/08/2005 9:48:44 PM PDT
by
jpsb
(I already know I am a terrible speller)
To: Ron in Acreage
Liberals always rely on an uneducated and uninformed public.That's why the teachers union doesn't teach any more. Support school choice.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson