To: subterfuge; Publius6961; Billthedrill; infidel29; Ditter; little jeremiah; baystaterebel; ...
84 posted on
06/09/2005 7:29:07 AM PDT by
vannrox
(The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
To: vannrox
85 posted on
06/09/2005 7:34:18 AM PDT by
SlowBoat407
(A living affront to Islam since 1959)
To: vannrox
I guess what the modern artists probably argue is that in the era of photography, what's the point of a painting that is nearly indistinguishable from a photograph.
Faneuse is very lovely, wonder how she kept her skin so fair working outside?
87 posted on
06/09/2005 7:49:31 AM PDT by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: vannrox; neverdem; MHGinTN
Cleopatra Testing Poisons on Condemned Prisoners 1897? Nah.
That painting was directly and shamelessly copied from Hillary's latest focus group polling at her TV offices (er, Senate Office) in her New York's presstitute's (er, dnc) offices.
93 posted on
06/09/2005 8:21:57 AM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(-I can only contribute to FR monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS contributes to her campaign every day)
To: vannrox
I must say that for a minute I thought that "The Excommunication of Robert the Pious" 2nd Pic, would be titled "Two people staring at a Marlboro".
129 posted on
06/09/2005 11:10:00 AM PDT by
kaboom
To: vannrox
Fabulous art, thanks for posting it. My favorites are some of the Impressionist. Talouse-Lautrec is my absolute favorite artist with Degas and Monet right behind. The ones you posted are a little bit too sentimental and sweet for me but I appreciate the skill and talent it took to draw and paint them.
Kids today are not being taught to draw I am afraid. A relative of mine is involved with the School Art Program associated with the Houston Rodeo Association. It is obvious to anyone who knows about projection knows that the high school kids who submit art for auction are projecting photographs and not drawing.
I tried to tell my relative this but I was told No that doesn't happen. We no longer discuss it. If you look at a pencil drawing by a kid from across the room and it looks like a photograph, then it was projected. The kids are selling their pencil drawings/projections for thousands of dollars. Very sad.
134 posted on
06/09/2005 11:21:05 AM PDT by
Ditter
To: vannrox
To: vannrox
Your "favorites" are stunning--I first visited the Art Renewel website several years ago, and agree with their philosophy and hope that they are able to change the current course of Art Study, not only in America, but abroad as well.
So Called "Modern Art" (although I try to be objective) is more like "Physcho-Art". When artists paint "what they feel", of course your going to end up with a canvas full of (unskilled), disorganized, worthless, chaos. But is that what they were taught as students?
My last visit to the High Museum of Art, there was a display of sculptures that were done by someone LICKING chocolate. It was nauseating and a waste of museum space and my time.
Don't get me wrong, I enjoy a Van Gogh or Gauguin as much as anyone, and truly enjoy the better art of ordinary people who paint because they love to paint, but I have no patience for someones outward display of their personality disorders on canvas, or their sexual fetishes formed by raw body parts in edible substrate.
144 posted on
06/09/2005 12:54:21 PM PDT by
two23
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson