Replies

That's the way the citizens of California want it. If they wanted to change the laws, or even the State Constitution, they have that power.

Do you have a problem with each state deciding how they want to live? Are you more comfortable with one set of laws that apply to every state?

Perhaps I should be asking you, "Do you believe in the concept of a "republic" and agree with its implementation in the US?"

SUPREME COURT RULING: You can arrest those using marijuana for medical purposes ^
Posted by robertpaulsen to KDD
On News/Activism ^ 06/08/2005 8:50:08 PM PDT · 1,075 of 1,083 ^

Let's be honest and open here. You're saying that the federal government has no business regulating any drug, recreational or prescription, and that it is up to each state to decide the issue.

_____________________________________

False Federalism: In Gonzales v. Raich, it's the state that's violating federalist principles. ^
Posted by robertpaulsen to William Tell
On News/Activism ^ 06/08/2005 8:35:56 PM PDT · 18 of 19 ^

Do you have a problem with each state deciding how they want to live? Are you more comfortable with one set of laws that apply to every state?

Paulsen plays both ends.. Yet again